Addressing Local Economic Disparities: Learning From Policy Failure in the UK

An image with the word success on which leads down to failure.

This report examines why, after more than four decades of national policy, the UK remains one of the most interregionally unequal countries in the industrialised world. Drawing on the academic discipline of policy failure, it applies a common framework to eight major UK instruments – from the Regional Development Agencies to the Levelling Up Fund and UK Shared Prosperity Fund.

It finds that failure is not a series of isolated mistakes by individual governments, but a systemic pattern built into how policy is designed and delivered. Ten failure characteristics recur across every instrument, driving an “implementation doom loop” of short-termism, under-investment and institutional churn.

The report assesses the new devolution era introduced by the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Act 2026, sets out what the world’s most effective governments do differently, and offers a constructive, forward-looking agenda for national and local leaders.

“Local and regional economic challenges are long-term ones. Only long-term policies will address these, so we must break the cycle of short-term policy and institutional churn.”

Dr Glenn Athey

National government should commit to a patient, properly funded, cross-party regional settlement – allocated by formula, insulated from the electoral cycle, and designed with implementation in mind from day one. Local and regional leaders shouldn’t wait for the national system to change: they should adopt strategic pragmatism, build powerful, evidence-led institutions, set targets that genuinely matter locally, and deliver demonstrable progress.

Use the ten policy failure characteristics, including misdiagnosis of structural problems as short-term shocks, chronic under-funding, competitive “begging bowl” funding, centralised control disguised as devolution, and the absence of a long-term, cross-party strategy, as a design checklist for any new policy or institution.


Watch the full version of this video.

Meet the author

Dr Glenn Athey

Dr Glenn Athey, LPIP Research Fellow, University of Birmingham. Glenn is an economist and local/regional economic development specialist with extensive experience advising national and local government on growth, devolution and place-based policy.

Glenn has worked as a senior manager and leader in several regional development agencies, the Centre for Cities, and a Local Enterprise Partnership; and at Cambridge Econometrics.

Glenn currently runs his own advisory and consultancy business. His LPIP research applies the academic field of policy failure to the UK’s record on regional economic disparities.

Publications

Communities in Their Places Evidence Review

The LPIP Hub “Communities in their Places” evidence review shows that while communities are central to addressing local economic, social and environmental challenges, their ability to do so varies widely depending on policy frameworks, resources and local capacity. It highlights that “community” is a complex, overlapping concept, but strong social

Towards A Place-Based Qualitative Data Observatory

This research briefing responds to Local Policy Innovation Partnership (LPIP) Hub work on data devolution, transparency, and place productivity. Building on this existing research, it argues that current UK data infrastructures do not yet accommodate the heterogeneous forms of qualitative data on which local, regional and national policymakers increasingly rely.

Outside-In: The Role of Social Entrepreneurs in Public Sector Transformation

This policy paper explores the role of social entrepreneurs as “outside-in” actors in public sector transformation. It argues that, in a period of profound institutional transition, public systems need to learn not only from within formal structures but also from actors operating at their boundaries. The briefing examines how social

Building Intergovernmental Capability Through Secondments: Lessons From Japan for the UK

This policy briefing explores how England’s devolution reforms could work more effectively by using staff secondments as a core part of the delivery system. Drawing on lessons from Japan’s structured, legally grounded approach, it shows how predictable and reciprocal staff movement can strengthen local capability, improve coordination across government tiers,