A Capacity-Building Strategy for English Devolution to Drive Geographic Fairness

This policy brief argues that capacity-building is essential if English devolution is to reduce rather than deepen spatial inequalities. The authors find that current approaches lack a clear definition of capacity, are not based on local need, blur responsibilities between central and local government, and risk favouring already well-resourced areas. They call for a national capacity-building strategy that defines and measures governance capacity, targets support according to local needs, clarifies responsibilities across government, and prioritises places with the weakest capacity.

“Capacity is the gateway to further devolution in England, yet it is unevenly distributed and poorly defined. Without deliberate action, devolution will widen the gaps between places”

The authors

Download the policy brief and read the underlying academic paper: Building Place-Based Capacity in an Asymmetric System. Policymakers and practitioners are invited to get in touch with the authors to discuss what a national capacity-building strategy for English devolution should look like.


Key findings

1 – Capacity

Capacity is the gateway to further devolution in England, yet it is unevenly distributed and poorly defined. Without deliberate action, devolution will widen the gaps between places.

2 – Four shortcomings for capacity-building

Our analysis of the English devolution agenda finds four shortcomings for capacity-building: no systemic definition of capacity; no needs-based allocation; no clear separation of central and local responsibility; and little attention to spatial inequality.

3 – Development of a national capacity-building strategy

We call on the government to publish a national capacity-building strategy that defines capacity systemically, disaggregates it into types, assesses need place by place, allocates responsibility more explicitly, and is framed first and foremost as an equalisation strategy.


About the author

Dr Charlotte Hoole – Research Fellow at City-REDI, University of Birmingham – LinkedIn profile

Dr Sam Warner – Lecturer in Politics at the University of Bristol – LinkedIn profile

Dr Jack Newman – Lecturer in Politics and Public Administration at the University of Liverpool – LinkedIn profile

Dr Timea Nochta – Associate Professor in Public Governance at the University of Birmingham – LinkedIn profile

Dr Peter Eckersley – Associate Professor in Public Policy and Management at Nottingham Trent University – LinkedIn profile

Publications

Towards an Integrated Understanding of Place

This report draws together evidence from across the Local Policy Innovation Partnership (LPIP) Hub’s extensive programme of evidence reviews, briefings and supporting publications. It asks what becomes visible when evidence on skills, innovation, communities, culture, environment, governance, leadership, data, business cases and partnership working is considered holistically. It finds that

Putting Place at the Heart of Growth: How Evidence Can Make Multi-Level Governance Work

On 27 September 2026, the Labour Party Conference fringe event, Putting Place at the Heart of Growth: How Evidence Can Make Multilevel Governance Work, brought together policymakers, researchers, local government leaders, universities, colleges and organisations working across communities and regions. Provocation Before the event, attendees were sent a provocation. The

Place-based Business Case and Economic Appraisal: Capacity and Capability

This report, by Alice Pugh, City-REDI, University of Birmingham, examines the capacity and capability of officers working in strategic authorities to develop, commission, scrutinise and use business cases and economic appraisals, while also considering the implications of devolution for place-based investment and assurance. The report draws on a mixed-methods survey

Local Innovations, Shared Lessons: Unpacking HDRC Community Engagement and Partnership Working in London

This research report focuses specifically on public and partner engagement across London’s Health Determinants Research Collaborations (HDRCs) and comparator boroughs, evaluating how local authorities are reshaping collaborative networks to address health inequalities. The study draws on 18 semi-structured interviews across six London local authorities: Islington, Tower Hamlets, Ealing, Lambeth, Southwark,