Skip to content

Communities in Their Places

This theme considers the current and potential future role of communities in addressing place-based challenges. Cohesive communities can mobilise social capital, tackle placed-based challenges, and identify avenues to bring about social, economic and environmental improvements in their area.

However, there is a need to develop a better understanding of individual and community behaviours, and how collaborative approaches can help shape social policies and local services that grow connectedness, build interpersonal and institutional trust and the wellbeing economy, as well as increase community resilience, and feelings of safety, health, wellbeing and quality of life.  

Key questions which the ‘Communities in their Places theme’ seeks to respond to include: 

  • Context: What is and should be the role of communities in addressing placed-based challenges? 
  • Engagement: How can different communities be better engaged to help shape priorities, processes and local services?  
  • Outcomes: How can communities best be engaged in self-determining in their places? 
  • Methods: How can co-design and co-production methods be developed and mainstreamed? Where are they appropriate? Where are they less appropriate? Why? 
  • Funding: How can funders best design funding to drive long-term locally-driven outcomes for communities? 

This theme focuses on three different types of place-based community action/ intervention domains and how capacities and capabilities can be developed within each of the domains.  

First, we are investigating the role of community business including Community Interest Companies, co-operative businesses and non-profit organisations. Emphasis is placed on drawing together evidence on how community businesses can be engaged and empowered. 

Secondly, the theme explores community assets, in particular, how communities come together to deliver place services such as good-bank or youth work or take over public assets such as libraries. An important current area of focus is the impact of the selling-off of public assets in the context of constrained local government finances. 

Thirdly, the theme aims to examine community engagement/activism, where communities are engaged in the design, development and delivery of business-as-usual services or new policies/interventions. We are bringing together partners to debate and analyse how community knowledge and expertise can be best harnessed for the benefit of local residents and businesses. We investigate different realms of community impacts and how members of the community, local businesses, and the public institutions serving and governing the community can best collaborate to support the growth of cohesive communities. We are exploring evidence on where change is decided upon versus where it is delivered, key reasons why previous community projects have failed and how these challenges could potentially be overcome in future. 

Another central aspect of this theme is understanding what works for engaging communities in terms of place-based policy designed and implemented at a variety of scales. We are exploring interventions within neighbourhoods, across local authorities, across combined authority areas, within specific geographical areas (e.g. rural, coastal) and by central government. Outputs from this theme will outline national community policy levers, how devolved approaches affect local actions, challenges experienced implementing policy and what skills are required by policymakers at various scales to engage with communities.  

Whilst predominantly focused on understanding experiences and policies across the four nations of the UK, this strand of Hub activity also has an international angle. The team are seeking to use selected international examples to identify relevant policy lessons for local, regional and national stakeholders in the UK. 

The team 

LPIP Hub Team 

Key Partners

  • Professor Chris Chapman (University of Glasgow) 
  • Tim Davies-Pugh (Power to Change) 
  • Helen Goulden (The Young Foundation) 
  • Professor Kathryn Higgins (Queen’s University Belfast) 
  • Paul Manners (National Coordinating Centre for Public Engagement) 
  • Jamie Ounan (Inner Circle Consulting) 
  • Professor Kiran Trehan (University of York) 
  • Carly Walker-Dawson (Involve) 
  • Professor Jane Wills (University of Exeter) 
Share:

Further themes

More in this theme

Further themes

Stock image of a mature man conducting a seminar / lecture with the aid of a large screen. The screen is displaying graphs & data associated with the earth.

Data for Place

This theme looks at what data is available for a place and what methods can address LPIP questions and challenges, especially where there are gaps in the data, or the data is inconsistent throughout years and /or data is not available at a low-level geography.

Read More
A diverse team looks happy in conversation. They are sitting around with laptops in front of them. Woman of Indian ethnicity leads the team

Professional Standards for Place-Based Research Partnerships

The theme of “Professional Standards for Place-Based Research Partnerships” addresses the growing need for Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) to engage effectively with local communities. Place-based research partnerships offer a unique opportunity to co-create solutions to regional challenges, fostering knowledge exchange between academics and stakeholders such as policymakers, practitioners, and citizens.

Read More
Two professionals are engaged in a focused conversation while holding digital tablet in a contemporary office space, featuring rustic exposed brickwork and warm natural light

Public Procurement and Innovation

A team at City-REDI currently works on a research programme focused on public procurement of innovation with Innovation Procurement Empowerment Centre (IPEC), part of the Connected Places Catapult. The IPEC Research team also collaborates with Centre for Local Economic Strategies (CLES) focusing on Anchor institutions (e.g., Birmingham Anchor Network), which encompass diverse local approaches to partnerships, innovative procurement practices and social value creation. We aim to collaborate with Local Policy Innovation Partnership (LPIP) Hub and LPIPs on issues related to innovation and public procurement with place-based policy perspectives.

Read More
Business meeting, two business people serious concentrated discussing strategy and plans, sitting at table with documents inside office at workplace discussing communicating looking at laptop screen.

Business Cases

Over the last few years there has been a growth in place-based funding through the development of business cases in line with the HM Treasury’s Green Book. However, business cases are more than a means or hurdle to receiving funding. Business cases are a management tool which is developed over time as a living document as the proposal for a project or programme develops. The Business Case keeps together and summarises the results of all the necessary research and analysis needed to support decision-making transparently. The purpose of this theme is to provide LPIPs, partners and stakeholders with the tools and knowledge required to develop effective business cases.

Read More
Mid adult businesswoman talking to group of seminar attendees in conference hall.

Place leadership

This workstream will reflect on current challenges and opportunities for place leaders to pursue inclusive, and sustainable, economic growth to identify what makes for good place-based leadership. It will develop insights for how place leaders can work in partnership to break down silos within and between institutions.

Read More
Group photo of four female friends blowing confetti into the camera lens. They are all dressed in vibrant colours and clothing at a festival in Northumberland in the north east of England.

Felt Experiences

In recent decades, urban planners and policymakers have been increasingly interested in better understanding the relationships between people and the places they inhabit. This shift coincides with a growing emphasis on the value of place in policymaking.

Read More