A Long-Term Strategy for Housing: Lessons Learned on the Role of Institutions and Governance

The UK Government has announced a £39 billion funding package and five-stage plan for social and affordable housing in England, with a comprehensive 10-year strategy due in 2025. This report reflects on the housing contexts of Scotland and England, drawing comparative lessons to strengthen institutional design, governance, and long-term planning for England’s housing policy.

It finds that while both nations face persistent challenges—supply shortages, affordability pressures, homelessness, fragmented responsibilities, and weak integration with wider policy—Scotland’s more coordinated governance, statutory housing rights, and stable planning frameworks provide useful contrasts. England’s reliance on market-led approaches, combined with short-term political cycles, inconsistent funding, and fragmented oversight, has undermined strategic capacity and delivery.

The analysis concludes that England requires systemic reform, including stronger institutions, empowered local authorities, cross-party commitment, and integrated governance structures, to ensure continuity, accountability, and long-term investment. Without such reforms, ambitious housing targets will continue to be missed; with them, a sustainable, equitable, and resilient housing system can be achieved.

Key messages

England’s pending 10-year housing strategy must move beyond short-term cycles by embedding stable governance, cross-departmental coordination, and independent oversight to provide the continuity and accountability needed for long-term housing reform.

To achieve resilient and equitable housing outcomes, England must empower local authorities with greater capacity and resources, secure multi-year investment certainty, and adopt systemic solutions that integrate supply, demand, finance, and governance.

Download the report

Download a summary of key points from the reports

Meet the Author

Linda Christie

Linda is an applied economist and strategic public policy professional with 25 years of varied policy and academic expertise, having delivered a range of projects of national significance. She trained as a government economist in the early part of her career, progressing on to head up economic development strategy at Glasgow City Council for over 10 years. Linda was Head of Scotland’s Green Skills Strategy at Skills Development Scotland, and latterly, Head of Programmes for Scotland’s Circular Economy Strategy at Zero Waste Scotland.

Return to theme page

Publications

Communities in Their Places Evidence Review

The LPIP Hub “Communities in their Places” evidence review shows that while communities are central to addressing local economic, social and environmental challenges, their ability to do so varies widely depending on policy frameworks, resources and local capacity. It highlights that “community” is a complex, overlapping concept, but strong social

Towards A Place-Based Qualitative Data Observatory

This research briefing responds to Local Policy Innovation Partnership (LPIP) Hub work on data devolution, transparency, and place productivity. Building on this existing research, it argues that current UK data infrastructures do not yet accommodate the heterogeneous forms of qualitative data on which local, regional and national policymakers increasingly rely.

Outside-In: The Role of Social Entrepreneurs in Public Sector Transformation

This policy paper explores the role of social entrepreneurs as “outside-in” actors in public sector transformation. It argues that, in a period of profound institutional transition, public systems need to learn not only from within formal structures but also from actors operating at their boundaries. The briefing examines how social

Building Intergovernmental Capability Through Secondments: Lessons From Japan for the UK

This policy briefing explores how England’s devolution reforms could work more effectively by using staff secondments as a core part of the delivery system. Drawing on lessons from Japan’s structured, legally grounded approach, it shows how predictable and reciprocal staff movement can strengthen local capability, improve coordination across government tiers,